|
- budget cuts to school funding, meaning less motivated
staff, school facilities lacking maintenance, lack of up-to-date educational
equipment, instead of home facilities like OakEdu offers: dedicated staff,
quiet clean rooms equipped with television, computers, websites, books...
- drop out, lack of motivation, frustration instead of continuous education,
motivation, pleasure of learning
- class size of 40 or 50 students, instead of OakEdu's maximum of 3 students
at a time
- yearly threat of teachers' strikes, with both sides using the students
as pawns, creating bad atmosphere, instead of the cooperative understanding
attitude of OakEdu's tutors, respecting the educational needs of children
- dealing with an institution where responsibility is blurred, instead
of traceability/accountability to a physical person, direct reporting
and involvement like at OakEdu
- restrictive laws, too many rules, rigid system, organizational constraints
hampering the corrective ability of teachers and inhibiting students expression,
instead of OakEdu's freedom of speech/thought/action
- peer groups behaviour expressing superficial values that do not help
in the overall well-being of the community nor the family, peer pressure,
bullying thus resulting in lowered self-esteem, self-confidence, psychotic
behaviours, loss of spirit instead of OakEdu's unconditional positive
support
- lot of wasted time at school compared to the one-on-one tutoring of
OakEdu where time is actually spent learning and developing knowledge,
harmony, healthy creative thinking and democracy
- lowest level of understanding in the classroom in order to be easily
digested by all students, instead of one-on-one individual specificly
tailored OakEdu's curriculum
- some moral issues with the official curriculum, not at OakEdu where
parents can ask what they don't want
- children in the public school are not as well medically assisted as
with a dedicated tutor
- questionable school safety level: exposure to drawn graffiti, presence
of knives, drugs, guns, etc.
- lecture-type of conferencing not adapted to some children's needs, instead
of acquiring customized one-on-one assistance in the weaker areas, and
growing excellent in the preferred subjects with a dedicated tutor
- gifted children in a classroom are not intellectually challenged enough
compared to a one-on-one tutoring education
- special needs children, like autists, cannot blossom within the regular
school system
- school doesn't promote regular interaction with people of all ages and
all thoughts, thus limiting exposure to the diversity of the world
- peer groups behaviours expressing greedy, materialistic, superficial
values are not helping the overall wellbeing of the community nor the
family
|
|